Cool Geometry and you may Proximal Femoral Fractures certainly Older Filipino Women: One Center Mix-Sectional Study
JAM Bengzon
Barrido CI, Bengzon JAM. Hip Geometry and you can Proximal Femoral Fractures one of Elderly Filipino People: An individual Hub Get across-Sectional Research. Malays Orthop J. 2022; 16(2): seven0-eight. doi: /MOJ.
Introduction:
Few controlled training discuss proximal femoral geometry and you will connection that have femoral shoulder (FN) or intertrochanteric (IT) fractures, especially one of several older Filipino population. Early in the day records, although not, however show multiple inconsistencies. The objective of the research is always to introduce a potential organization anywhere between radiographic hip geometry and you can proximal femoral cracks predicated on proportions taken from more mature Filipino girls.
Information and methods:
This is certainly a corner-sectional study of 182 Filipino female ? sixty yrs . old from the a single place past 2019-2020. Clients was indeed divided into organizations having femoral shoulder breaks (n=84), intertrochanteric breaks (n=64), and people rather than identified hip cracks (n=34). Standard pelvic radiographs that have power over cool interior rotation is done and pursuing the radiographic variables was basically compared: stylish axis length (HAL), femoral shoulder length (FNL), neck shaft angle (NSA), horizontal offset (HO), femoral lead free russian chat lines diameter (FHD), and you can femoral shoulder diameter (FND).
Results:
Studies implies that a heightened FND increased the danger to own getting one another femoral neck (Otherwise = 1.29, 95% CI step one.06 – 1.62; p=.011) and you may intertrochanteric fractures (OR: step one.22, 95% CI 1.07-dos.16; p=0.018). To have intertrochanteric breaks alone, a greater NSA (Or step one.twenty seven, 95% CI step 1.02 – step 1.58, p=0.033) and you may big HO (Or 1.31, 95% CI step 1.02 – 1.64, p=0.036) and additionally enhanced the risk for it crack form of if you are an extended HAL is actually protective (Otherwise 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 – 0.98, p=0.30).